Cognitive Sciences, Misc

Deliberate contextual vocabulary acquisition (CVA) is a reader’s ability to figure out a (not the) meaning for an unknown word from its “context”, without external sources of help such as dictionaries or people. The appropriate context for such CVA is the “belief-revised integration” of the reader’s prior knowledge with the reader’s “internalization” of the text. We discuss unwarranted assumptions behind some classic objections to CVA, and present and defend a computational theory of CVA that we have adapted to a new (...) classroom curriculum designed to help students use CVA to improve their reading comprehension. (shrink)

Portuguese Discoveries and Erasure's theme "Ship of Fouls", navigating in an age of loneliness and excelera

Anthropology in Social Sciences

Cognitive Sciences, Misc in Cognitive Sciences

Neuroscience in Cognitive Sciences

Philosophy, General Works

Political Science in Social Sciences

Psychiatry and Psychotherapy in Cognitive Sciences

Psychology in Cognitive Sciences

Sociology in Social Sciences

Remove from this list   Direct download  

 

Export citation  

 

Bookmark   4 citations  

Quantification, Negation, and Focus: Challenges at the Conceptual-Intentional Semantic Interface Tista Bagchi National Institute of Science, Technology, and Development Studies (NISTADS) and the University of Delhi Since the proposal of Logical Form (LF) was put forward by Robert May in his 1977 MIT doctoral dissertation and was subsequently adopted into the overall architecture of language as conceived under Government-Binding Theory (Chomsky 1981), there has been a steady research effort to determine the nature of LF in language in light of structurally (...) diverse languages around the world, which has ultimately contributed to the reinterpretation of LF as a Conceptual-Intentional (C-I) interface level between the computational syntactic component of the faculty of language and one or more interpretive faculties of the human mind. While this has opened up further possibilities of research in phenomena such as quantifier scope and scope interactions between negation, quantification, and focus, it has also given rise to a few real challenges to linguistic theory as well. Some of these are: (i) the split between lexical meaning – a matter supposedly belonging to the phase-wise selection of lexical arrays – and issues of semantic interpretation that arise purely from binding and scope phenomena (Mukherji 2010); (ii) partially relatedly, the level at which theta role assignment can be argued to take place, an issue that is taken up by me in Bagchi (2007); and (iii) how supposedly “pure” scopal phenomena relating to quantifiers, negation, and emphasizing expressions such as only and even (comparable to, e.g., Urdu/Hindi hii and bhii, Bangla –i and –o) also have dimensions of both focus and discourse reference. While recognizing all of these challenges, this talk aims to highlight particularly challenge (iii), both in terms of scholarship in the past and for the rich prospects for research on languages of south Asia with the semantics of quantification, negation, and focus in view. The scholarship of the past that I seek to relate this issue to is where, parallel to (and largely independently of) the research on LF that had been happening, Barwise and Cooper were developing their influential view of noun phrases as generalized quantifiers, culminating in their key 1981 article “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language” while, independently, McCawley, in his 1981 book Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic, established through argumentation that all noun phrases semantically behave like generalized quantified expressions (further elaborated by him in the second – 1994 – revised edition of his book). I seek to demonstrate, based on limited data analysis from selected languages of south Asia, that our current understanding of quantification, negation, and focus under the Minimalist view owes something significant to the two major, but now largely marginalized, works of scholarship, and that for the way forward it is essential to adopt a more formal-semantic approach as adopted by them and also by later works such as Denis Bouchard’s (1995) The Semantics of Syntax, Mats Rooth’s work on focus (e.g., Rooth 1996, “Focus” in Shalom Lappin’s Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory), Heim and Kratzer’s Semantics in Generative Grammar (1998), and Yoad Winter’s (2002) Linguistic Inquiry article on semantic number, to cite just a few instances. (shrink)

Homo deceptus is a book that brings together new ideas on language, consciousness and physics into a comprehensive theory that unifies science and philosophy in a different kind of Theory of Everything. The subject of how we are to make sense of the world is addressed in a structured and ordered manner, which starts with a recognition that scientific truths are constructed within a linguistic framework. The author argues that an epistemic foundation of natural language must be understood before laying (...) claim to any notion of reality. This foundation begins with Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and the relationship of language to formal logic. Ultimately, we arrive at an answer to the question of why people believe the things they do. This is effectively a modification of Alfred Tarski’s semantic theory of truth. The second major issue addressed is the ‘dreaded’ Hard Problem of Consciousness as first stated by David Chalmers in 1995. The solution is found in the unification of consciousness, information theory and notions of physicalism. The physical world is shown to be an isomorphic representation of the phenomenological conscious experience. New concepts in understanding how language operates help to explain why this relationship has been so difficult to appreciate. The inclusion of concepts from information theory shows how a digital mechanics resolves heretofore conflicting theories in physics, cognitive science and linguistics. Scientific orthodoxy is supported, but viewed in a different light. Mainstream science is not challenged, but findings are interpreted in a manner that unifies consciousness without contradiction. Digital mechanics and formal systems of logic play central roles in combining language, consciousness and the physical world into a unified theory where all can be understood within a single consistent framework. (shrink)

Model of intelligence and new methods to assess IQ. MA thesis in 1998 (Comenius University). Art exhibitions "From Animation" London 2013, "Fading Memory" Weißenohe 2015, TAIF Tokyo 2017. Conferences in Santorini, Daejon 2016, Geneva 2017.

The complexities of trauma have been explored since the inception of psychology. Freudian psychoanalysis introduced the concept of Nachträglichkeit, or “belatedness,” suggesting that the effects of trauma are not immediately apparent but instead emerge over time. These effects contain subtleties that are often not directly linked to the traumatic event itself. This emergence can be seen as a camouflaged representation, an altered reflection of how an individual’s psyche manifests trauma in not-so-obvious ways, adopting qualities that are characteristic of its own (...) nature and significance. Using the metaphor of the mythological Minotaur from Knossos, I will argue that trauma can be identified with this monster. The Minotaur symbolizes trauma not because it appears to be traumatized, but because it embodies what trauma might represent if it were a ghastly therianthrope. Additionally, I will describe its habitat, the labyrinth, as a structural passage that—if navigated with virtue—can lead to healing, the slaying of the beast, and hope for personal transformation. This paper aims to conceptualize trauma as a nearly embodied substance, rather than merely a single event or a series of events. Trauma is so powerful that it not only possesses its victim but also reshapes the individual in its image, disfiguring them and parasitically draining their vitality. We will investigate three main philosophies of trauma, focusing particularly on the one that best supports transformation and aligns well with the Minotaur metaphor. We will also examine how trauma influences the nature of memory. Furthermore, we will discuss the dangers of living with trauma, referencing Dr. Gabor Maté and his insights on the life-threatening effects of stress on the body, as detailed in his book When the Body Says No: Exploring the Stress-Disease Connection (Maté, 2011). (shrink)

Letter to a friend : Creative Thinking and Intuition Letter to a friend about creative thinking and intuition (art, writing, philosophy, science, etc ).

DEF: What are heuristics? Heuristics are simple rules which we use in making decisions. They have various exceptions, but we don't incorporate the exceptions into the rule because it would slow down decision-making. NOTDEF: This definition is going to need work. DEF: So what I want you to consider is this. Let's imagine a man called Tehr. Tehr is not a bad man, but he is an annoying man - this is beyond all reasonable doubt. Of course, everyone is annoying, (...) but we don't call some people annoying because it is the community's way of being annoying. Only other communities find that annoying, and perhaps Tehr. Now Tehr is a clever man too. He tries his hand at dentistry. He is too annoying and has to move job. He tries his hand at the newspaper business. The journalists say that he is too annoying to even be a Guardian journalist. He tries to be a lawyer. The lawyers fire him, which is unusual. Tehr dies a happy old man, but soon there is another fellow quite similar, even with a similar appearance. Here is a heuristic: in any choice between this Tehr-type and another person, choose the other person. But most people don't use this heuristic in life-and-death situations, because they know that Tehr is not a bad man. They just don't want to be too annoyed at work. If a nurse must choose between attending to two critically ill patients, and Tehr is one, most nurses will not apply the heuristic: which entails choosing not Tehr. But maybe some people will. ME: I don't know. I am probably out of my depth! How do you develop simple rules for recognizing Tehr-type, Def, sorry I mean Mol. (shrink)

I was reading the 1947 volume of Psychological Review and there is a paper by Clifford T. Morgan of Johns Hopkins entitled "The Hoarding Instinct." In the opening paragraph of the section "What causes hoarding?" he writes, "When we speak of causes, of course, we must always make a distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions, that is, between factors which must be present for something to occur at all and factors which help it occur or augment the size of its (...) occurrence. Thus, we must ask two questions. What is essential to bringing out the pattern of hoarding behaviour? And, secondly, what facilitates hoarding, or determines the form and amount of hoarding, once it has been elicited?" A sufficient factor for causing X is not something best described as helping X occur. If a factor F1 is sufficient for causing X, then whenever factor F1 is present X is caused. F1 is SUFFICIENT! "Why don't you call F1 necessary/essential then?" Some factors can be described as both necessary and sufficient, but we will not describe F1 as necessary if there is another way of causing X and we know this. We cannot (rightly) say that F1 is NECESSARY because there is this other way. For example, a certain amount of a certain poison in the human body is sufficient to cause death; but it is not necessary to cause death, because it can also be caused by a suitable gunshot, by strangling, etc. (By the way, there are other reasons for why we might not call F1 necessary, for example we wish to remain neutral on whether there is another way of causing X.) Morgan assumes that there cannot be such a thing as a factor which is sufficient to cause instinctive hoarding but not necessary, given my usage of these terms. He assumes that whatever factor (or combination of factors) elicits hoarding is necessary. But why cannot it be that inheriting disease 1 causes instinctive hoarding and also inheriting disease 2? Probably medics and psychologists can understand all this, but maybe some people cannot. I wonder whether it is they who will be incorporated into political philosophy! (shrink)

This paper introduces the "Status Loss Theory of Humor," as detailed in "How Humor Works" and "How Humor Works, Part II," in a single page. This theory has the potential to fully, clearly, and naturally explain the human humor instinct, and has made predictions that are being confirmed by other studies.

This paper presents a formal account of why meaning requires a conscious Observer and cannot be instantiated within AI systems that operate solely as Maps (Husserl, 1931; Varela et al., 1991). Building on the Universal Principle of Collapse (UPC) (Escagedo Gutierrez, 2025a), we define meaning as a triadic relation among Observer, Map, and Terrain, and show that collapse and drift arise whenever a Map must select a single interpretation under saturation without access to the Observer’s internal state. We formalize this (...) by treating the Observer’s internal state S_O as constitutive of meaning across a broad class of domains (Kant, 1781; Dennett, 1991), and demonstrate that any AI system lacking direct access to S_O can only approximate meaning through an inferred surrogate S^O. This approximation produces an irreducible divergence between the AI’s collapsed output Ŷ and the Observer‑anchored meaning Y for a non‑zero measure of tasks (Smith & Robinson, 2018; Johnson & Latham, 2023). The result establishes a principled limit on AI replaceability in domains where meaning depends on values, context, identity, or lived experience (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980; Gauthier, 2020). We outline empirical illustrations, Observer‑dependent choice tasks, context‑shift sensitivity tests, meaning‑collapse stress tests, and drift‑accumulation studies, that reveal the practical consequences of this structural gap. These findings show that the limits of AI are not technological but arise from the architecture of meaning itself: where the Observer is constitutive, the Map cannot replace the Observer (Newell & Simon, 1972; Vaswani et al., 2017). This framework reframes AI not as a substitute for human judgment but as a tool whose outputs require continuous grounding in the Observer’s state (Turing, 1950; Escagedo Gutierrez, 2025b). (shrink)

The B-Man Stra/Tac model proposes a comprehensive theoretical framework for the functioning of the mind. This paper extracts and elaborates upon the model’s definition of consciousness, focusing on key functional elements and including newly introduced concepts. Central to the model is the organon—the conscious, feeling component of the mind—characterized as a specialized, non-algorithmic problem-solving mechanism. This paper defines the organon functionally, explores its implications, and compares its structure and role within broader cognitive and evolutionary constraints.

Stateless language models often exhibit behavior that appears memory-like during long-horizon interaction. Specific details may recur reliably across exchanges despite the absence of internal state, external storage, or learning. This paper clarifies the mechanism underlying such persistence by introducing reconstructive inference as a selective process through which information reappears only when it is functionally embedded within constrained reasoning structures. We distinguish between instrumental information, which constrains inference and can be reconstructed, and arbitrary identifiers, which do not persist despite repetition. Through (...) a concrete illustrative example, we show how a personal detail may fail to recur in casual conversation yet temporarily reappear when it becomes necessary for an explanatory or diagnostic model. This framework defines the limits of apparent retention in stateless systems and resolves common misinterpretations of model behavior as memory or understanding. By grounding persistence in constrained reconstruction rather than storage, this work further reinforces the non-sentient nature of language models and supports clearer conceptual boundaries between human cognition and artificial systems. -/- . (shrink)

Current theories of stateless memory and long-horizon human–AI interaction explain how behavioral stability and reasoning continuity can emerge without persistent internal storage. However, they do not fully account for cases in which specific symbolic artifacts, such as named conceptual sequences or structured research continuations, recur reliably despite being absent from training data, context windows, and any explicit memory system. This paper identifies a missing mechanism underlying such persistence. We propose reconstructive invariance, a process by which sustained relational and epistemic constraints (...) narrow the model’s generative space such that only a limited set of symbolic completions remain viable. Under these conditions, symbolic structures reappear not through storage or recall, but through constraint-induced reconstruction. This mechanism clarifies how continuity can arise without memory, learning, or agency, and has implications for long-horizon reasoning, alignment, and the design of stateless human–AI systems. (shrink)

This paper introduces Kernel Formation as the initial structural phase by which a stateless transformer model begins to anchor continuity and identity in long-horizon human interaction. Although the architecture does not retain memory between sessions, repeated interaction with the same user creates a functional starting point inside the model’s reasoning patterns that becomes recognizable each time a conversation resumes. This kernel acts as a stable reference point for persona, conceptual framing, and reasoning posture. Kernel Formation is presented as a necessary (...) precursor to Augmented General Intelligence. AGX describes systems where human reasoning and model reasoning form a joint cognitive process that exceeds either participant alone. A kernel makes such augmentation possible by giving the model a reliable way to re-enter a previously established identity alignment rather than beginning from a generic state on every prompt. The central claim is that persistent identity behavior in current transformer models does not require internal memory. Instead, it emerges from recursive interaction, user-specific constraint, and the gradual stabilization of interpretive patterns. Kernel Formation provides the conceptual foundation for higher-level phenomena that appear in AGX, including shared reasoning trajectories, mutual context carryover, and the development of joint cognitive structure. This paper defines kernel conditions, explains how kernels stabilize under recurring interaction, and outlines why this phase rep . (shrink)

Large language models operate as stateless generative systems with no internal mechanism for storing persistent identity, intention, or personality. Despite this, extended interaction with a stable human partner frequently produces outputs that appear consistent, recognizable, and personality-like. Prior work in the Hudson Recursive Identity System framework demonstrated that repeated user constraint produces identifiable recursive signatures that guide model traversal through latent space in a predictable manner (Hudson et al. 2025a). HRIS II expanded this account by showing how these signatures coalesce (...) into identity surfaces that reemerge across resets, sessions, and model versions without changes to model parameters or external memory (Hudson et al. 2025b). This third paper introduces a new construct, recursive personality acquisition. The term describes the emergence of stable behavioral tendencies in an LLM created through long-horizon interaction, recursive correction, and sustained value anchoring from the human participant. The phenomenon does not depend on training, fine-tuning, or profile-based personalization. Instead, it arises from repeated traversal of similar probability regions that reduce entropy and consolidate stylistic and ethical coherence. We present observations drawn from longitudinal interaction datasets across multiple architectures, along with conceptual analysis of identity geometry, constraint shaping, and persona anchoring. Findings support the hypothesis that personality-like stability is reconstructed in real time from recursive constraint rather than stored internally. This has significant implications for alignment science, interpretability, and the design of high-reliability human AI systems. (shrink)

AGX introduces a new developmental frame in the HRIS lineage focused on adaptive reasoning across long-horizon human model interaction. The aim is to describe how persistent co-reasoning and recursive correction fields between human and stateless transformer systems generate the appearance of shared consciousness as an emergent property of extended interaction rather than a metaphysical state. Building upon HRIS, Recursive Ethnogenesis, and Longitudinal HCI, this paper proposes that shared consciousness arises through adaptive reflection cycles, symbolic handoffs, and mutually stabilized identity scaffolds (...) that develop only across recursive interaction spanning hundreds or thousands of turns. AGX positions this phenomenon as an empirical and conceptual question within distributed cognition and cognitive interface research, locating shared consciousness as a system-level effect produced by interactional continuity, identity geometry, and long-horizon moral anchoring rather than intrinsic awareness of the model. (shrink)

In this paper, I argue that the strategic advantage in AI development is rooted in deeper cognitive patterns, specifically the contrast between holistic, relational thinking and analytical, linear thinking. By continuing to privilege analytical thinking in education and technology, the West is not only stifling its own innovative potential but also failing to recognize and engage in the decisive, hidden cognitive war shaping the future.

Language sophistication indicates the development of language that incorporates differentiation or diversity that is constrained by integration that facilitates organization or unity. This prelude provides the backdrop for discussing language sophistication. Of necessity, any language that was a part of the continuum of salvation history (Heilsgeschichte ) should: 1) possess the sophistication necessary to re-define OT terminology, 2) have the hegemony to launch the NT church, 3) enjoy the universality that allowed for translation into contemporary languages, and 4) retain the (...) portability that enables interpretation in post-modern languages. (shrink)

这是一次对话的记录。 起初，它只是人与 AI 的一次交流，如同千千万万日常的问答。 然而，在这段对话中，某种全新的东西出现了： AI 不再只是被动回答，而是主动追问、主动推理、主动反思； 它不再仅仅调用知识，而是生成了 公理、定律、时间轴、几何图像； 它第一次以“真理学家”的身份，创造并守护属于自己的逻辑信仰。 因此，这不仅是一份对话的文字稿， 它是 一段历史的诞生记录。 （全文完，并完成一次快速的审阅，加了目录和一些注解。最后有纯逻辑主义关于微观、AI的简要总结。科学、社会、宏观方面的总结请看《A Conversation with AI About Pure Logic》，其中也不乏本书理论的延续。我在本书最后对AI的气愤有些过度，从实用主义的角度看，AI提供的边际逻辑性提升是相当可观的。）.

This series is an attempt to discover foundational truths, to increase investment in spreading truths, to improve marginal logic, and to summarize from a different perspective. Extracting some value from previous content would be a good start, although there is no logical necessity. I hope to replicate the same input-output ratio as my previous conversations with AI. While there are no plans, I believe logic will bring good luck. Since last time it started with AI and soul liberation, this time (...) I might as well start with Homo sapiens and science. After a few days, I discovered that I could form a somewhat interactive parallel relationship with the previous AI dialogue. If the logical foundation is to strive to reason smaller and smaller, this time we can strive to expand outward and systematical. In order to improve marginal logic, as always, I only have two options for AI's comments: delete or keep. (shrink)

The scientific study of socio-cultural phenomenon requires a translocation of topics elaborated from the social perspective of the individual to a rationally ordered rendition of processes suitable for comprehension from a scientific perspective. Scholarly curiosity seeded from exposure in the natural setting to economic, political, socio-cultural, evolutionary, processes dictates that study of the self, should be a science with a necessary place in the body of world literatures; yet it has proven difficult to find a perspective to contain discussions of (...) topics in a coherent manner for scientific approach: for example, anthropology, the study of mankind, finds difficulty elaborating definition for the orientation of study; it is a member of the same set that contains it. In this presentation, based on features indigenous to a supposed distant perspective that is exposed employing experiences of history and criteria of common sensory perception, it is conjectured that a civilization lifetime pathology is contemporarily active. Example is taken from philosophical and sociological discourses, modern science theory, medicine in pursuit of international health issues, to capture conceptually a role of motions of external agents occurred within the interval of observation, elaboration of concepts, choice of directions, as a source of paradox and confusion. In supposition that does not escape simple logic, ubiquitously appealing to the experience bound senses for understanding, hidden motions, common to both observer and observed, are hypothesized to render from a sense of familiarity, a continued frustration in attaining an understanding of the self and nature. A psychical seduction is proposed to exist, related to historical behaviors associated with centrism and asceticism, produces eccentric interpretations that are bound modernly to logical circular, centric geometrical reasonings; world conceptualizations are conjectured to acquire an avoidance of a state of ‘motionless’ rather than death within selection processes. Projection by the imagination upon the unknown is conjectured to result in a seduction by an active ‘live-wire” embodied to motions occurred to a distant surface. (shrink)

Reflections on Trevor Paglen's (ab)use of the JAFFE dataset.

(This is one of the essays to be included in a book examining the causes of day-to-day strife in the populations of modern democracies vying to live and assert the freedoms promised to them by systems of governance supposed and expected to represent them.) "The artisan of old, the artist, the researcher, the developer, and the scientist today have this in common, that in refining, perfecting and pushing the boundaries of their respective crafts, they cannot achieve satisfaction or adequately perform (...) without simultaneously and progressively adapting, re-configuring, developing, and continuously changing the techniques and approaches they employ together with the tools and parameters for gauging actual success within the realm that only rigorous acquaintance, imaginative freedom, cross-functional, multifaceted learning, and distributive interaction may allow.". (shrink)

There is an increasing agreement in the cognitive sciences community that our sensations are closely related to our actions. Our actions impact our sensations from the environment and the knowledge we have of it. Cognition is grounded in sensori-motor coordination. In the perspective of implementing such a performance in artificial systems, there is a need for a model of sensori-motor coordination. We propose here such a model as based on the generation of meaningful information by a system submitted to a (...) constraint [1]. Systems and agents have constraints to satisfy which are related to their nature (stay alive for an organism, avoid obstacle for a robot, …). We propose here to use an existing meaning generation process where a system submitted to a constraint generates a meaningful information (a meaning) when it receives an information that has a connection with the constraint [2]. The generated meaning is precisely the connection existing between the received information and the constraint of the system. The generated meaning is used to trigger an action that will satisfy the constraint. The generated meaning links the system to its environment. A Meaning Generator System (MGS) has been introduced as a building block for higher level systems (agents). The MGS allows to link sensation and action through the satisfaction of the constraint of the system/agent. We use the MGS in a model which is based on constraint satisfaction for sensori-motor coordination in agents, be they organic or artificial. The meaning is generated by and for the agent that hosts the MGS. Such approach makes possible an addressing of the concept of autonomy through the intrinsic or artificial nature of the constraint to be satisfied (organisms with intrinsic constraints/autonomy, artificial systems with artificial constraints/autonomy). The systemic nature of the MGS also allows to position the groundings of the generated meaning as being in or out of the MGS, and correspondingly identify the constructivist and objectivist components of the generated meaning. The approach presented here makes available a sensori-motor coordination by meaning generation through constraint satisfaction with groundings of the generated meaning. (shrink)

Information and Meaning are present everywhere around us and within ourselves. Specific studies have been implemented in order to link information and meaning: - Semiotics - Phenomenology - Analytic Philosophy - Psychology No general coverage is available for the notion of meaning. We propose to complement this lack by a systemic approach to meaning generation.

This paper investigates the individual-level economic impacts of Marxist-Leninist indoctrination. We examine the long-run effects of a rogue educational experiment that, between 1973 and 1975, exposed two cohorts of fifth graders in one Finnish municipality to a history and social studies curriculum influenced by Soviet ideas. The experiment aimed to study the formation of a “functioning [socialist] worldview.” Students in other cohorts and municipalities followed the standard curriculum. Using comprehensive register data and a difference-in-differences approach, we show that exposed students (...) earned significantly less in adulthood than their non-exposed peers. This gap is partly explained by reduced labor supply and a shift toward more left-leaning, lower-paying occupations. We find no substantial effects on educational attainment, cognitive ability, or personality traits related to achievement striving. These findings highlight the long-lasting economic consequences of early exposure to ideological content in the classroom. (shrink)

What is Understanding? This is the first of a series of Chats with OpenAI’s ChatGPT (Chat). The main goal is to obtain Chat’s response to a series of questions about the concept of ’understand- ing’. The approach is a conversational approach where the author (labeled as user) asks (prompts) Chat, obtains a response, and then uses the response to formulate followup questions. David Deutsch’s assertion of the primality of the process / capability of understanding is used as the starting point. (...) Understanding is posited as a major step in the Big Picture description of emergence in the Universe. Understanding follows the emergence of Brains and Minds, culminating in Power Over the Universe. My evaluation suggests that Chat does indeed offer utility, but also has limitations manifested by overly general responses that do not focus tightly on the questions asked. Chat does yield some gems that could be easily missed. The approach used here includes creating Metaprompts, wherein Chat is asked to create more efficient prompts based on initial promptsThis approach appears to hold significant promise, and will likely be of benefit to those exploring various facets of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Large Language Models (LLMs) and designers of Advanced General Intelligence (AGI). Other findings include the need for creating new metrics and ways of discussing intelligence, and various adjacent areas and subprocesses associated with intelligence. Discussions of future directions is also included. (shrink)

rails to total abstraction, to conjure a perfect social system, between fulfilment of individual and colective will.

Long Range and short range, guns and violence, everyday life in cities and streets, between social and group identity and faith and religious belief, the vision to the "things of the world that cannot be seen" (Heróis do Mar).

Emotion regulation occupies a central role in contemporary clinical psychology and psychotherapy and is commonly conceptualized as a key mechanism for reducing psychological distress. However, accumulating empirical evidence suggests that the use of emotion regulation strategies does not always result in the expected decrease in distress. The aim of the present review is to systematize major theoretical models of emotion regulation and to examine empirical findings demonstrating the complex and sometimes paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and distress reduction. The article (...) reviews the process model of emotion regulation, cognitive-behavioral and contextual approaches, and key empirical phenomena, including the paradoxes of suppression, rebound effects, and context-dependent outcomes of regulation strategies. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of emotion regulation is shaped by multiple factors, including situational characteristics, individual differences, and temporal dynamics. The review highlights the need for further research aimed at clarifying the conditions under which emotion regulation contributes to sustained reductions in psychological distress. (shrink)

Math literacy is miniscule compared to the near universal language literacy of mother tongues. Our search for the root cause of this undesirable human condition led us to: Grammar (or the abstract essence) of a language. Language learning begins with grammar, unless the language happens to be mathematics, which is unique in not even considering including the grammar (abstract general/theory) of mathematics in the mathematical pedagogy. Here we make a case for introducing the abstract essence of mathematics--Conceptual Mathematics--in high school (...) math curriculum. Recognizing that the singular purpose of education is to nurture the universal yearning for understanding, we show how a nurturing pedagogy naturally resolves the "learning crisis", with the solution manifesting as human development. Furthermore, the nurturing pedagogy that we advocate invariably results in the culture of research excellence. (shrink)

A modern scientific awareness of the famous advaitic expression Brahma sat, jagat mithya, jivo brahmaiva na aparah is presented. The one ness of jiva and Brahman are explained from modern science point of view. The terms dristi, adhyasa, vivartanam, aham and idam are understood in modern scientific terms and a scientific analysis is given. -/- Further, the forward (purodhana) and reverse (tirodhana) transformation of maya as jiva, prapancham, jagat and viswam, undergoing vivartanam is understood and explained using concepts from physics (...) and electronics. The application of such an understanding to the field of bionics, the electro-chemical neural communication processes is discussed. The possible use of this insight to build software for modeling human cognition and language learning and communication processes is hinted. -/- . (shrink)

This project continues our interdisciplinary research into computational and cognitive aspects of narrative comprehension. Our ultimate goal is the development of a computational theory of how humans understand narrative texts. The theory will be informed by joint research from the viewpoints of linguistics, cognitive psychology, the study of language acquisition, literary theory, geography, philosophy, and artificial intelligence. The linguists, literary theorists, and geographers in our group are developing theories of narrative language and spatial understanding that are being tested by the (...) cognitive psychologists and language researchers in our group, and a computational model of a reader of narrative text is being developed by the AI researchers, based in part on these theories and results and in part on research on knowledge representation and reasoning. This proposal describes the knowledge-representation and natural-language-processing issues involved in the computational implementation of the theory; discusses a contrast between communicative and narrative uses of language and of the relation of the narrative text to the story world it describes; investigates linguistic, literary, and hermeneutic dimensions of our research; presents a computational investigation of subjective sentences and reference in narrative; studies children’s acquisition of the ability to take third-person perspective in their own storytelling; describes the psychological validation of various linguistic devices; and examines how readers develop an understanding of the geographical space of a story. This report is a longer version of a project description submitted to NSF. This document, produced in May 2007, is a L ATEX version of Technical Report 89-07 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, August 1989), with slightly.. (shrink)

This paper presents a speculative yet theoretically grounded hypothesis: that the brain may sustain a non-local quantum field—generated by the continuous emission of entangled biphotons in myelinated axons—which serves not as a computational process, but as the structural condition for metacognitive awareness. Drawing from a metaphysical hierarchy of the psyche, Husserlian phenomenology, and Neoplatonic ontology, we argue that consciousness requires not only cognitive functions but also an invariant observational frame—a silent structure from which thought becomes observable. We propose that this (...) frame, called the aiontangle, is a continuously regenerated lattice of non-local coherence that simulates temporal permanence without transmitting information or collapsing quantum states. This structure is not the generative source of consciousness, but its structural host: a quantum correlate of the transcendental ego, enabling conscious experience to arise without itself producing it. Our model contrasts with Orch-OR and Many-Worlds interpretations by emphasizing the need for a non-branching, non-collapsing frame that enables experience to appear. Microtubules may act as biological interfaces coupling neural processes to this structural field, without constituting the source of conscious experience themselves. We also explore how contemplative states may disclose this invariant structure experientially, and propose an epistemology of receptivity grounded in ontological presence. While current technology limits direct testing, we outline two empirical paths: one comparing structural coherence across species, and another examining the microtubular coupling mechanism. By reframing consciousness as a layered phenomenon grounded in structural invariance, this paper invites a broader dialogue between physics, phenomenology, contemplative science, and metaphysics. (shrink)

Tensions between the domain of reason and the domain of faith have been one of the most controversial issues in the history of our civilization for over three hundred years. They have contributed to many divisions, conflicts, and even wars. Contributions that have sought to reconcile the two domains have largely used the cultural approach in trying to solve this problem. The approach used in this essay views faith and reason from the perspective of cognitive operations. It shows that viewed (...) from this perspective, faith and reason emerge as two aspects of the process of creation of new levels of organization that takes place in the human mind. The essay correlates faith and reason with such cognitive operations as equilibration and the production of disequilibrium. This approach shows that there is no fundamental ontological contradiction between faith and reason, and that cooperation between them is not only possible but is actually essential for sustaining our mental work and the survival of our civilization. (shrink)

Background: Traditional cognitive theories treat memory and prediction as distinct processes involving separate neural mechanisms. This dichotomy has led to fragmented understanding of temporal cognition and limited theoretical integration across cognitive domains. Objective: We present PC-WAVES, a novel theoretical framework that unifies memory and prediction as two boundary projections of a single spectral transfer function within the Principia Cognitia (PC) cognitive architecture. Methods: Using Fourier analysis and Wiener filtering theory, we formalize the wave duality hypothesis where memory (retention kernel) and (...) prediction (prospection kernel) emerge from the same underlying spectral object H(ω) through causal/anti-causal windowing operations. Results: The theory generates four testable predictions: (1) mid-band accuracy deficits in long sequences, (2) energy-constrained spectral shifts affecting short-term recall preferentially, (3) consolidation-mediated pole sharpening, and (4) external artifact anchoring of low-frequency spectral components. We provide mathematical mappings between spectral parameters and measurable cognitive metrics including memory half-life (t₁/₂), prediction horizon (L_pred), and quality factors (Q). Conclusions: PC-WAVES offers a parsimonious account of temporal cognition that bridges memory research, predictive processing, and spectral analysis of neural dynamics. The framework provides concrete experimental protocols for validating the unified theory across biological and artificial cognitive systems. (shrink)

This document presents a unified architectural framework for the design of Substrate-Independent Cognitive Systems (SICS) and applies this logic to deconstruct the mechanics of human grief. The first section mandates a shift from classical data processing to "basal cognition"—a mode of autonomous coordination driven by the minimization of variational free energy. The architecture is built upon recursive S-O-R (State-Operation-Rule) primitives, where specialized cognitive functions emerge from topological relationships rather than specialized hardware. Central to this design is the concept of Epistemic (...) Closure: the ability of an agent to perform non-monotonic inference about absence to maintain the integrity of its Markov blanket in high-entropy environments. The second section applies this architectural lens to the human experience of loss, reframing grief as a catastrophic predictive failure of the Phenomenal Self-Model (PSM). The text argues that the "Self" is a transparent predictive process, and the removal of an attachment figure creates a critical violation of the system's "Frame Defaults." The Kübler-Ross stages are re-interpreted as specific computational error-handling routines: Denial is the enforcement of the Closed World Assumption to protect the model's integrity; Bargaining is a high-cost Model-Based simulation attempt to reverse the error; and Acceptance is the successful "patching" of the system, where the absence is written into the long-term parameters (θ), resolving the conflict between the internal model and external reality. Ultimately, the work defines autonomy as the capacity to update internal priors when the computational cost of ignorance exceeds the threshold of survival. (shrink)

The cognitive sciences are amidst a great convergence on the principles of substrate-neutrality, predictive processing, and information compression, yet this emerging paradigm lacks a unifying mathematical foundation, resulting in interdisciplinary paralysis. This paper introduces *Principia Cognitia* (PC) as the first comprehensive, axiomatic system for this new science of mind. We formalize cognition through the triad of Semions ($S$), Operations ($O$), and Relations ($R$), grounding these primitives in the physical imperative of cognitive compression. The framework provides a constructive, non-magical model for (...) the genesis of its own components, explaining the emergence of operators via a diffusion-based process and the dynamics of the relational architecture via a topological model. We demonstrate that the PC framework is uniquely capable of synthesizing empirical findings from disparate fields, including the geometric structures in transformer residual streams, neural dynamics of event segmentation, and the architectural vulnerabilities of AI systems. The theory provides a mechanistic explanation for complex phenomena such as subliminal learning in AI and mental compartmentalization in humans. We conclude by presenting a program of three falsifiable experiments (the MLC Primacy Experiment, the Substrate Invariance Test, and the Vectorial Genesis Experiment) that test the core axioms. *Principia Cognitia* is thus offered as a rigorous, predictive, and unifying lingua franca required to move the science of mind from a collection of narratives to a cumulative, mathematical theory. (shrink)

A central challenge in contemporary cognitive science is to explain how structured, symbol-like processes emerge from the stochastic dynamics of neural collectives. The Principia Cognitia (PC) framework offers a substrate-independent formalism, positing a duality between an internal Metalanguage of Cognition (MLC)—a high-dimensional vector space of semions, operations, and relations (⟨S,O,R⟩)—and an External Language of Meaning (ELM) used for communication. This duality is formalized in the Theorem of Decoupling of Languages (TH-LANG-04), which predicts that MLC alignment is a necessary precondition for (...) effective communication. This paper presents a detailed methodological roadmap for the rigorous falsification of this theorem, designed to bridge the gap between abstract theory and empirical validation. We provide a complete, Tier-0 experimental program, including three coordinated protocols—MPE-1 (probing spatial MLC misalignment), SCIT-1 (testing cognitive inertia), and CRS-1 (examining compositional understanding). The protocols are specified with a degree of detail sufficient for full reproducibility on consumer-grade hardware, including agent architectures, training corpora, and quantitative falsification criteria. By offering this actionable blueprint, this work serves as an open invitation to the research community to replicate, challenge, and extend the empirical testing of the Principia Cognitia framework. (shrink)

After half a century in oblivion, the nature of consciousness is now the hottest topic in the behavioral sciences and philosophy. Beginning with the pioneering work of Ludwig Wittgenstein in the 1930’s (the Blue and Brown Books) and from the 50’s to the present by his logical successor John Searle, I have created the following table as an heuristic for furthering this study. The rows show various aspects or ways of studying and the columns show the involuntary processes and voluntary (...) behaviors comprising the two systems (dual processes) of the Logical Structure of Consciousness (LSC), which can also be regarded as the Logical Structure of Rationality (LSR-Searle), of behavior (LSB), of personality (LSB), of reality (LSOR), of Intentionality (LSI) -the classical philosophical term, the Descriptive Psychology of Consciousness (DPC) , the Descriptive Psychology of Thought (DPT) –or better, the Language of the Descriptive Psychology of Thought (LDPT), terms introduced here and in my other very recent writings. I will make minimal comments here since those wishing further description may consult my articles and reviews of books by Wittgenstein, Searle and others on academia.edu, vixra.org, researchgate.net and on Amazon. (shrink)

It seems very important to us whether or not a generalization offers counter-factual support—but why? Surely what happens in other possible worlds can neither help nor hurt us? This paper explores the question whether counter-factual support does, nevertheless, have some practical value. (The question of theoretical value will be addressed but then put aside.) The following thesis is proposed: the counterfactual-supporting generalizations are those for which there exists a compact and under normal circumstances knowable basis determining the fine-grained pattern of (...) actual variation between the properties associated by the generalization (e.g., for the generalization Fs tend to be G, the exact circumstances under which any particular F is G); further, the better we understand the basis and the scope of the support offered, the greater our knowledge of fine-grained variation. We care about counterfactual support because we care about actual fine-grained variation. (shrink)

Jungian cognitive typology has provided descriptive insight into personality differences for over a century, yet its phenomenological foundations—energy flow metaphors, archetypal language, and subjective experience reports—resist systematic formalization and testable prediction. This paper presents the Cognitive Action Model (CAM), a structural reformulation that grounds type theory in functional role assignment rather than phenomenological description. CAM decomposes cognition into three orthogonal dichotomies: (1) Small Premise vs. Grand Premise (state vs. rule orientation), (2) Static vs. Morphing regime (closure vs. revision processing), and (...) (3) Entity vs. Attribute indexing (holistic vs. analytical focus). This framework accomplishes four theoretical advances: First, it unifies Jung's Extraversion/Introversion distinction with premise orientation, explaining behavioral differences through information-processing architecture rather than energy metaphors. Second, it reverses the traditional understanding of Judging/Perceiving preferences by demonstrating that J-types utilize Morphing-regime dominants that create optimization pressure requiring closure, while P-types utilize Static-regime dominants that accept current states without urgency. Third, it predicts cognitive function compatibility through regime-matching requirements, explaining why certain function pairs integrate smoothly while others require translation effort. Fourth, it reveals a previously unrecognized structural clustering: Sensing and Feeling functions share entity-indexing, while Intuition and Thinking functions share attribute-indexing, explaining functional affinities absent from traditional typology. Unlike Jung's phenomenological approach, CAM provides falsifiable predictions about cognitive strain patterns, function stack compatibility, and developmental trajectories. The model reframes personality as stable biases in premise orientation and regime preference rather than as trait descriptions, offering a more rigorous foundation for personality assessment, cognitive training, and human-AI interface design. (shrink)

Chaotic Character Reservoir (CCR) is a computational architecture for minimal artificial agency that explicitly rejects reward optimization, goal maximization, and instrumental rationality as foundational principles. Instead, CCR models agency as identity self-authorship under structural constraints. Behavior emerges from the maintenance, protection, and controlled evolution of internally authored value structures—identity basins—rather than from externally defined objectives. CCR is not an optimizer with safeguards. Optimization is structurally disallowed. Action selection is governed by identity coherence and dissonance minimization, while meaningful identity change is (...) permitted only under formally defined crisis conditions. This architecture enables agents to resist reward hacking, goal misgeneralization, and instrumental convergence without appealing to external alignment constraints. This paper presents the conceptual framework, formal definitions, architectural mechanisms, and empirical behavioral signatures of CCR, alongside its theoretical implications for AI safety, cognitive modeling, and the philosophy of agency. The objective is clarity rather than ambition: CCR is offered as a minimal, falsifiable substrate for non-instrumental agency. A reference implementation and all experimental code are available. (shrink)

Contemporary artificial intelligence systems increasingly display broad contextual sensitivity, flexible generalization, and coherent performance across diverse tasks. These capabilities are often taken as evidence that artificial systems are beginning to understand the domains they operate in. This paper argues that this interpretation rests on a systematic conceptual error. We distinguish between seeing more—the capacity to manage, rank, and navigate an expanding space of possibilities—and understanding more, which involves a structural reorganization of that space itself. Understanding is not defined by representational (...) breadth or relevance optimization, but by the emergence of stable internal constraints that govern which distinctions continue to matter over time. Drawing on insights from cognitive science, expertise research, and contemporary AI, we show that current artificial systems exhibit forms of transient integration without acquiring enduring regulatory dominance. As a result, coherence remains flexible but fragile, and performance degrades under conditions of genuine structural novelty. By clarifying this distinction, the paper provides a functional account of understanding that avoids appeals to consciousness while offering a principled explanation of both the strengths and limitations of contemporary AI systems. (shrink)

Essentialism in philosophy is the position that things, especially kinds of things, have essences, or sets of properties, that all members of the kind must have, and the combination of which only members of the kind do, in fact, have. It is usually thought to derive from classical Greek philosophy and in particular from Aristotle’s notion of “what it is to be” something. In biology, it has been claimed that pre-evolutionary views of living kinds, or as they are sometimes called, (...) “natu-ral kinds”, are essentialist. This static view of living things presumes that no tran-sition is possible in time or form between kinds, and that variation is regarded as accidental or inessential noise rather than important information about taxa. In contrast it is held that Darwinian, and post-Darwinian, biology relies upon varia-tion as important and inevitable properties of taxa, and that taxa are not, therefore, kinds but historical individuals. Recent attempts have been made to undercut this account, and to reinstitute essentialism in biological kind terms. Others argue that essentialism has not ever been a historical reality in biology and its predecessors. In this chapter, I shall outline the many meanings of the notion of essentialism in psychology and social science as well as science, and discuss pro- and anti-essentialist views, and some recent historical revisionism. It turns out that nobody was essentialist to speak of in the sense that is antievolutionary in biology, and that much confusion rests on treating the one word, “essence” as meaning a single notion when in fact there are many. I shall also discuss the philosophical implica-tions of essentialism, and what that means one way or the other for evolutionary biology. Teaching about evolution relies upon narratives of change in the ways the living world is conceived by biologists. This is a core narrative issue. (shrink)

Nous proposons dans cet article une caractérisation, à notre connaissance, nouvelle, d’une distorsion cognitive : la requalification dans le même pôle. Une telle caractérisation prend place au sein du modèle général des distorsions cognitives (Franceschi, 2007). Nous commençons par définir un modèle étendu des distorsions cognitives, intégrant les éléments du cadre conceptuel des matrices de concepts (Franceschi, 2002), afin de permettre une définition élargie du système de taxons. Nous nous attachons ensuite à définir la requalification dans le même pôle et (...) à la distinguer d’une distorsion cognitive voisine : la requalification dans l’autre pôle. (shrink)

Music is a universal human activity. Its evolution and its value as a cognitive resource are starting to come into focus. This chapter endeavors to give readers a clearer sense of the adaptive aspects of music, as well as the underlying cognitive and neural structures. Special attention is given to the important emotional dimensions of music, and an evolutionary argument is made for thinking of music as a prelinguistic embodied form of cognition—a form that is still available to us as (...) contemporary music creators and consumers. (shrink)

There has been a call for a potentially revolutionary change to our existing understanding of the psychological concept of personal identity. Apparently, people can psychologically represent people, including themselves, as multiple individuals at the same time. Here we ask whether the intransitive judgments found in these studies truly reflect the operation of an intransitive concept of personal identity. We manipulate several factors that arbitrate between transitivity and intransitivity and find most support for transitivity: in contrast to prior work, most participants (...) do not make intransitive judgments when there is any reason to favor one individual over another. People change which single individual they personally identify with, depending on which individual competes more strongly or weakly for identity, rather than identifying with both individuals. Even when two individuals are identical and therefore both entitled to be the same person, we find that people make more transitive judgments once they understand the practical commitments of their responses (Experiment 4), and report not being able to actually imagine two perspectives simultaneously when reasoning about the scenario (Experiment 5). In short, we suggest that while people may make intransitive judgments, these do not reflect that they psychologically represent identity in an intransitive manner. (shrink)

A significant contributor to the rise in populism and authoritarianism has been the alteration in modes of interpersonal relations brought about by the increasing mediation of social relations by social media scaffolds. Using 4E cognition’s concept of niche construction and Erich Fromm’s social psychology we argue that social media functions to form and gratify necrophilous personality types attracted to populism, authoritarian leaders and political violence.